Bryan A. Garner

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: whether (3).

whether (3). Today: “Of whether.” “Whether” usually directly follows the noun whose dilemma it denotes: “decision whether,” “issue whether,” “question whether.” But “regardless,” an adverb, makes “regardless of whether.” Although “issue whether” is typically better than “issue of whether,” the latter phrase has certain justifiable uses in which “of” is obligatory, usually when “issue” is …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: whether (3). Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: whether (1).

whether (1). Today: “Whether or not.” Despite the superstition to the contrary, the words “or not” are usually superfluous, since “whether” implies “or not” — e.g.: o “In another essay, ‘The Rules of the Game,’ he discusses moral codes and whether or not [read ‘whether’] they work.” Diane Hartman, “At Life’s End, Carl Sagan Awed …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: whether (1). Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries.

Miscellaneous Entries. wastewater. One word. way(s). In the sense “the length of a course or distance,” “way” is the standard term {a long way}. “Ways” is dialectal. So it’s surprising to find “ways” in serious journalism — e.g.: “This is premature, of course; Fox still has a ways to go [read ‘some way to go’?] …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: whet.

whet. “Whet” (= to sharpen or stimulate) commonly appears in the cliché “whet the appetite.” Unfortunately, though, “whet” is often confused with “wet” (= to moisten, dampen, or drench) — e.g.: o “More importantly, he wet [read ‘whetted’] the appetite of Atlanta and presumably much of the country for an Olympics that, at least in …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: whet. Read More »

LawProse Lesson #165: “Ruling” vs. “opinion” vs. “judgment,” etc.

Ruling, order, opinion, judgment, decree, and verdict: What are the differences? Although these terms are sometimes used interchangeably, they shouldn’t be. A ruling is the outcome of a court’s decision, whether on some particular point of law (such as the admissibility of evidence) or on the case as a whole. A ruling may lead to an …

LawProse Lesson #165: “Ruling” vs. “opinion” vs. “judgment,” etc. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: *where it’s at.

*where it’s at. This phrase and its variants have long set up parents’ and teachers’ classic grammatical correction: “Where’s my lunchbox at?” “Between the a and the t.” Besides the “sin” (to many early-educators) of ending a sentence with a preposition, the “at” is redundant, adding nothing to “where it is” or “where is it?” …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: *where it’s at. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries.

Miscellaneous Entries. waiting in line; waiting on line. The former is the standard American English expression. The latter is a regionalism in the Northeast, especially in New York. Although some might think that it’s the product of the computer age (i.e., being “online”), in fact it dates back to the 19th century. wake; awake; awaken. …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: whence.

“Whence” (= from where; from which; from what source) is an especially formal word that some readers consider stilted. Rudolf Flesch prematurely called it “obsolete,” perhaps to reinforce his absolute recommendation to use “from where” instead. (See The ABC of Style 294 [1964].) But “from where” would hardly work in every context, and “whence” retains …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: whence. Read More »

LawProse Lesson # 164: What’s the difference between a court’s finding and a court’s holding?

Lesson #164 What’s the difference between a court’s finding and a court’s holding? Judges at any level make findings of fact and holdings or conclusions of law. Good legal writers observe the distinction and never say that a court holds on questions of fact. Ex.: Because the court finds that the jury’s finding is supported by the evidence, the court holds that …

LawProse Lesson # 164: What’s the difference between a court’s finding and a court’s holding? Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: whatever; whatsoever.

whatever; whatsoever. Part A: Intensive Use. As an intensive (meaning “at all”), “whatsoever” is an established idiom in American English {he had no reason whatsoever}, though it is obsolescent in British English. Still, many American stylists prefer the shorter word, “whatever” — e.g.: “OPIC provides no grants or free benefits of any kind to any …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: whatever; whatsoever. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries.

Miscellaneous Entries. voyage; passage. A slight differentiation is possible. “Voyage” denotes a journey, especially by sea. “Passage” is almost synonymous with “voyage” in that sense, but it does not have as much connotation of returning. That is, “passage” usually denotes some sort of one-way change, such as (1) a progression from one place or state …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: what (3).

what (3). Today: Plural “what” Uses. Part A: In a Noun Clause Followed by a Plural Predicate. In this construction, “what” means “the things that” — e.g.: “What the judge principally wants to hear are the relevant cases.” Glanville Williams, Learning the Law 163 (11th ed. 1982). Although some would say that the following sentence …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: what (3). Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries.

Miscellaneous Entries. volitional; *volitive. “Volitional” = of or belonging to volition (i.e., an act of willing or resolving); pertaining to the action of willing. E.g.: “Mary Ann Sandoval . . . testified that she believed Stuart’s memory loss and behavioral problems were self-serving and volitional.” Ginny McKibben, “Suspect Cleared for Slay Trial,” Denver Post, 29 …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries. Read More »